Shumaker Manufacturing

A Legal & Industry Review


“New Partnership Audit Regime: Opt-Out, Push-Out, or Pay-Up?”

On November 2, 2015, Congress passed the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA),¹ which enacted a new centralized audit regime (regime) that applies to all entities taxed as a partnership for taxable years starting after December 31, 2017. The most important feature of the regime is that it refocuses all audit activities on the partnership itself instead of the partners, including requiring assessments of tax deficiencies and collections at the entity level. The BBA identified several issues for which the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) were to promulgate regulations to carry out the statutory objectives. This was a significant undertaking for Treasury and IRS, as the BBA flipped partnership taxation from a “flow-thru” construct to one in which the partnership would be primarily liable for any additional income tax due after audit. The congressional goal was to reduce the administrative burdens placed on IRS for audits of partnerships, and move that burden to the partnerships themselves.² Continue reading


AT&T – Time Warner Merger Challenge Might Signal Policy Change on Vertical Mergers

The Department of Justice (“DOJ”) recently sued to block AT&T’s $85.4 billion bid for Time Warner, stating that such a merger would harm consumers by weakening competition.  The lawsuit signals a policy change that “vertical mergers” will be more heavily scrutinized by U.S. regulators going forward.  Businesses should therefore consider this development when merging with or purchasing another business. Continue reading


“Bankruptcy Law Update: Preferences and Selected Bankruptcy Issues”

Preference Claims:
Elements:  A preference is a transfer of property of a bankruptcy debtor that (1) was to or for the benefit of a creditor; (2) was on account of an antecedent debt; (3) was made while the debtor was insolvent; (4) was made within 90 days of the filing of the bankruptcy petition; and (5) allowed the creditor to receive more than the creditor would receive if the payment had not been made but the creditor receives what it would receive in a liquidation of the debtor.  These elements are almost always (but not absolutely always) met, but there are several defenses available:  subsequent new value, ordinary course of business (either between the parties or in the industry), contemporaneous exchange for new value, and others.

Important consideration!:  The most important rule to remember is to never, ever pay a preference demand without first performing a detailed analysis of the defenses.  The application of each defense is highly technical, and the interplay of the defenses is complicated.  This analysis needs to be done by bankruptcy counsel.  Bankruptcy debtors or trustees, when making demand for payment of a preference, frequently offer a discount of around 20% to settle.  Never accept this offer.  These claims can often be resolved for no payment or for a payment under 10% of the demand amount, but the analysis and outcome of each situation is highly fact specific. Continue reading


Arrivederci! Delaware Bankruptcy Court Sends U.S. Vendor Packing… to Italy

xitaly_rialto_ed_shiler_shutterstock_jpg_pagespeed_ic_X4wwCOkN4I

Arrivederci! Delaware Bankruptcy Court Sends U.S. Vendor Packing...to Italy

Arrivederci! Delaware Bankruptcy Court Sends U.S. Vendor Packing… to Italy

David Conaway is the Chair of Shumaker’s Bankruptcy, Insolvency and Creditors’ Rights Practice and Co-Chair of Shumaker Global and Shumaker Manufacturing. His focus is representing manufacturing companies regarding a variety of issues involving customers and the supply chain, including commercial and financial contracts, disputes, insolvency; and cross-border transactions, litigation and insolvency. David advises clients and handles matters throughout the U.S. and represents numerous foreign-based clients regarding U.S. issues, and U.S. companies doing business globally.